It was predictable in its way. It happened in the migration from print to radio, then again in the migrations from radio to broadcast TV, from broadcast TV to cable, and from cable to digital. More and more authentic storytellers were left behind — orphaned by the institutional consolidation of power and wealth — with each subsequent media migration. Finally, all that remained was Soviet-style agitprop: the official but bloodless theater produced when mediocre artists are paid by the state to produce mediocre propaganda.
IN the off-chance you haven’t already, please make a donation pledge to support my work here at the Quality of Life Resistance Movement. My creditors will thank you. And so will I — in advance: THANK YOU!
Of course, the most easily imitated art is bad art, mediocre art. That’s why the state so much prefers the services of bad and mediocre artists to great artists. Mediocre artists are easy to convert into propagandists. Mediocre art and propaganda are, after all, the ubiquitous but essential facades of pop culture, whose only real imperative as state agent is to obliterate history and bury any dangerous artifacts from the past — like great art.
By contrast, great art cannot be conscripted to speak for the state because great art doesn’t even speak for the artist; it speaks only for itself. So by all means, stick it away in a museum where someone actually has to leave the house to see it, or convert it into a money laundering scheme for the obscenely wealthy who answer to no one but themselves. Either way, mission accomplished.
The most critical features of agitprop as a state tool are the critically low standards it imposes and the critically low expectations it invokes. That’s why no one expects anything more from it than cheap political theater: no one really believes it in the first place. The built-in lack of credibility means those in power — those who commission the agitprop — can change the entire narrative at a moment’s notice however and whenever they want. Turn it all upside down on a whim; no need to explain why the new narrative is necessary, or why the old narrative is suddenly so last Tuesday. After all, the new narrative is guaranteed to be every bit as insane as the one it replaces. Notably, no one will notice and no one will care because the narrative no longer matters in the least. And when the narrative no longer matters, only the power remains.
Nothing makes sense when all that remains is power. The slightest scratch on the surface renders the official climate change, antiracism, and gender equity narratives utterly incoherent and senseless. Likewise, the official Covid narrative was and remains utterly incoherent and senseless. True also of our ruinous open border policy and the official Ukrainian war narrative: both utterly incoherent and senseless. They all defy rational explanation, scientific or otherwise.
Of course the populists among us might offer a simpler, more rational explanation for the apparent insanity: the accelerated migration of wealth and power from poor and middle class people of all colors worldwide upward to those institutions and individuals already pregnant with far too much wealth and far too much power. But apparently, making sense of the world these days is simply too conspiratorial by half.
Populist conspiracy theories aside, when the global power narrative breaks down, when it ceases to make any sense — regardless of how they bend, fold, staple, or mutilate it in the Sisyphean effort to spin a silk purse from a sow’s ear — we suddenly find ourselves in shark-infested waters. Ideologically identical and too big to fail, the most powerful institutions in the world have now realized — individually and collectively — that they no longer need a narrative at all, coherent or otherwise. In the absence of a coherent narrative — once everyone has already entered a narcotic state of suspended disbelief — rich and powerful institutions and individuals simply no longer need to explain themselves. Because they already possess the only thing that truly matters to them, the only thing they truly wanted in the first place: power.
When life imitates bad art, absent the need or patience for real storytellers and real stories, all that remains is power. Sheer, unadulterated, brute power awash in a sea of predatory acronyms like ESG, SDG, DEI, BIPOC, LGBTQIA+, WHO, WEF, CDC, CBDCs, DOD, DHS, FBI, NSA, CIA, EU, and NATO.
When power is all that remains, science and justice and the rule of law no longer matter. When power is all that remains, crisis and chaos reign supreme, and insanity is suddenly sane. When power is all that remains, only psychopaths and sociopaths will have power.
So when life imitates bad art and all that remains is power, do one thing: tell your story. Tell it to the ones you love. Tell it to your kids. Tell it to your friends. Tell it to your neighbors. Tell your story and the story of your family and the story of your town to anyone who listens. When all that remains is power, your story is the greatest story ever told.
We are telling our story. In more ways than visible. To direct your view to your family has been mankind's solution over the centuries. Whether this solution was used or not is a different topic. The competing direction? It depends on the century. Ours unfortunately the worse. Broadcasting. Storytellers were "left behind" you say. Left behind from where? Storytellers never lost their opportunity to tell stories. To the audience their consciousness could reach. The broadcasting did not leave anyone behind who saw the value of their story. The rest is the ladder of fame. To become famous by means of visibility, not physical, but digital, is to become famous. Where? In the mind. I would love to read your thoughts about this. Fame in the past belonged with kings and heroes by means of talk. Deeds, talk and boom in the mind by awe. Visible even in invisibility. They heard the deed and did not see the king. Today we see the king and the kings does no deed. Simply fame through irrelevance. Yet famous. All of us are famous. Why? We are being seen. By what? By the mind. That's where fame resides. There is a rank to this as well, as to what is prefered but fame nonetheless. My point here is to support your idea of small broadcasting. Of telling stories to those we can reach. Also to point out that no matter how complicated a system becomes, we are not without a solution. We can tell stories to our own.
Rousseau seems to have been such an artist. (What’s wrong with these people? Why don’t they appreciate, nay revere, my work? Ignoble savages! Ego compensation ensued, got him into history books.)
Hitler. Housepainter who became a house artist? A burning down the house artist? Artsonist?
(Well, he didn’t exactly burn down Dresden, did he? So just one of the boysenberries. And no berries without supporting sticker bushes. Please don’t throw me into that briar patch, Br’er Fox!)
David Cole, Takimag, this week wrote that studios, streaming, is going the way of the Blockbuster buggy whip. (I usta like driving the buggy to Blockbuster & whipping up some flicks on dvd.)
Cuz “gaming” (immersive virtual reality - bigger dopamine hits when one is “participant” rather than passive receptacle), & Only Fans, etc (also apparently interactive).
But hanging a urinal on a wall & getting away with calling it art was not a recent event. Was that foreshadowing, or projection? Urine the $ now. Somehow. Don’t ask me how. That’d be at least another 1000 words.
And “power?” Is it?
Decoder rings that translate the secret handshakes & signs into sense, a plot, a scheme, an arc (of Orcs)… well, the one true ring seems impotence epitomized, anti-allure allegorized, & never not trying to prove otherwise; a hole that cannot be filled.
Or vice versa.
Do you think Gates & Bezos & Page & & & wouldn’t be much closer, if not fully, “incels” without the bankrolls?
(Is that a bankroll in your pocket, or am I just happy to see your bulging pocket?)
(Montezumas Revenge of the Nerds is proving to be very unpleasant.)
Libido dominandi.
And Jimmy Cagney was a Yankee Doodle Dandy. Because, probably, somewhere on the list, probably near the top, that’s where the women, & the money, was itemized.
Willie Sutton mighta been an actor, too, or a more overtly official actor (most “all the world’s a stage”) given the chance. Instead he wound up robbing banks.
Cuz that’s where the money is, he said.
And money’s convertible into women. Into convertibles, too … lotsa women like those.
So upside down, inside out, backwards: “rewop”. Like Mussolini redux. (If it walks, quacks like a dux … there’s gonna be guano all over the place.)
Get those bullet trains (of abuses) running on split-second time again.
Cuz enough is never enough.
It's still the same old story
A fight for “love” and glory
A case of do or die
Casablanca on the Potomac - everywhere else, too. Su casa is mi casa & painting ‘em all red, ink or blood, is fine so long as ya’ll own nada … & are happy (just like the constitution needed that bill of rights cherry on top to sell it).
Institutions, & their defense attorneys (with & without BAR cards, not to mention Browning automatic rifles), are full of institutional wo/men. Enough time “served” on the inside makes the great outdoors toxically inhospitable. Makes the servers that way, too.
Don’t eat there. The line will drop your food on the filthy floor enroute to your plate & the deliverancer’s will spit in it.